We Only Need to be Right Once

For the sake of argument, let’s use my preferred term, “ultraterrestrial” as opposed to the normative “extraterrestrial.” Ultraterrestrial defined in the Valle or Keen sense of the term, beings of comparable to advance intelligence that don’t fall in the species classification spectrum of what we would consider “human.” There’s just too much evidence that points in either direction, but I find ultraterrestrial is more apt catch all term encompassing the possibilities of beings both from other planets as well as different dimensions, space and time. 

It is my contention in the realm of dealing with skeptics who deny the existence of such beings that the burden of proof is heavier for them. The researcher into the existence of the ultraterrestrial only needs to be definitively right once and the argument is over. The skeptic must continuously disprove the evidence, or lack thereof, debunk the event and logically counter-argue for the truth. Such is the burden of the skeptic.