Jack Brewer throws some needed cold water on the latest “Disclosure” excitement. This is reasonable. We have been down this road before. But what makes the forthcoming bill from the Select Committee on Intelligence is that the events leading up to it have been barriers blown through which we’ve not previously seen in relation to increased transparency from the military and government. It is logical to conclude this paradigm is changing for the better. And while researchers and other interested parties are right to temper their expectations and remain cautious, there is also much cause for some enthusiastic hope.
The established certainty of the existence on anomalous skyborne phenomena which exhibits clearly physical manifestation presents ramifications throughout various strings of human inquiry, many of which we haven’t thought of yet.
For starters, theories focusing on “holographic” presentations to unsuspecting witnesses or subjects may likely lose a bit of credence. We know physical objects with mindbending peculiar features and maneuverability exist and can function in ways that defy our understanding of what is capable within the bounds of known physics. It is thus possible that military personnel on the ground have observed and dealt with such devices as Cmdr. David Fravor and his crew did in the now-famous Nimitz encounters.
One could be forgiven to conclude that the establishment as factual certainty that craft of unknown origin and capability exists as part of our consensus reality and that the human experience must proceed henceforth with this knowledge in mind. What remains the great puzzlement is the nature, origin, and purpose of such objects. This is where the potential for vast cognitive dissonance amongst the populace resides.
There is frequent use of the word, “data” in the official verbiage. Notably, you do not read many discussions from official government sources around discerning the origin and intent of the craft other than frequent use of the term, “potentially hostile.”
It seems from any determinative conclusion there are only two possible outcomes available. One, the craft are designed and operated by foreign nation-states. Two, they are not.
One is fraught with many eye-opening considerations for our country. Two is fraught with many mind-blowing ramifications for the human species. Let us hope that somewhere in the collected data there is to be found a path to understanding what the nature of the unidentified aerial phenomena is for all our sakes.
© 2020 Metron Deep Research All Rights Reserved
MetronDeep 